"Creation Is Not Control"
Filed in archive Consumer Rights , Society & Public Policy on March 24, 2006
eWeek Technology Editor Peter Coffee writes on the distortion of content, or intellectual property (IP), in the digital world. He reminds us that despite the entertainment business's spin and unquenchable thirst for control and power, copyright law's primary goal is to promote innovation for society and future content-makers.
Excerpts from his article:
Digital media, it must be recognized, don't merely reproduce the function of conventional media at a lower cost of producing a higher-quality copy. Digital media also shift a delicate and crucial balance in the direction of giving content creators far more control of how their work is used, reducing the chance that old work will trigger new ideas.
It's simply not acceptable to let phrases like "intellectual property" continue to shape this debate with the false analogies they inspire. IP is not a symbolic parallel to real estate or other assets that can have only one beneficial owner at any time. The central question is not how to prevent ideas and expressions from being stolen; the question is how to maximize the benefit of inspiring people to create new work while minimizing the nuisance of granting them any post-creation rights at all.

Permalink: "Creation Is Not Control"
Tags: ip content
Vote for "Creation Is Not Control":
|
Rating: 6.00 out of 1 vote(s) cast.
|
Response from:
drivers
(03/25/06 12:38pm)
I have read this all artice and I'm shocked. It's not optimistic.
Response from:
Doom
(06/03/07 10:49pm)
Thank you for giving me place to put my link:
weddinghttp://www.6k2.com/myforum/wedding.html">wedding rel="nofollow" href="weddinghttp://wedding.mundoforo.com/">wedding rel="nofollow" href="wedding')" rel="nofollow">http://wedding.all-forum.net">wedding
[url=http://wedding.mundoforo.com/]wedding[/url][url=http://www.6k2.com/myf
orum/wedding.html]wedding[/url][url=http://wedding.all-forum.net]weddi
ng[/url]
weddinghttp://www.6k2.com/myforum/wedding.html">wedding rel="nofollow" href="weddinghttp://wedding.mundoforo.com/">wedding rel="nofollow" href="wedding')" rel="nofollow">http://wedding.all-forum.net">wedding
[url=http://wedding.mundoforo.com/]wedding[/url][url=http://www.6k2.com/myf
orum/wedding.html]wedding[/url][url=http://wedding.all-forum.net]weddi
ng[/url]
Response from:
Working Capital
(10/18/07 10:24am)
It's simply not acceptable to let phrases like "intellectual property" continue to shape this debate with the false analogies they inspire. IP is not a symbolic parallel to real estate or other assets that can have only one beneficial owner at any time. The central question is not how to prevent ideas and expressions from being stolen; the question is how to maximize the benefit of inspiring people to create new work while minimizing the nuisance of granting them any post-creation rights at all.
| RSS | |
|
| |
| Yahoo! |
|
| Bloglines |
|
| Follow us on Twitter! |
Most Popular
Analysis
Apple
Artists
Best of
Blog
Business
Commentary
Community
Companies
Consumer Rights
Did you know
DRM
Education
Events
Finance
Fun
Games
Government
Industry
Information about
