Filed in archive
Consumer Rights
, Society & Public Policy
by Marc on March 24, 2006

Excerpts from his article:
Digital media, it must be recognized, don't merely reproduce the function of conventional media at a lower cost of producing a higher-quality copy. Digital media also shift a delicate and crucial balance in the direction of giving content creators far more control of how their work is used, reducing the chance that old work will trigger new ideas.
It's simply not acceptable to let phrases like "intellectual property" continue to shape this debate with the false analogies they inspire. IP is not a symbolic parallel to real estate or other assets that can have only one beneficial owner at any time. The central question is not how to prevent ideas and expressions from being stolen; the question is how to maximize the benefit of inspiring people to create new work while minimizing the nuisance of granting them any post-creation rights at all.
Permalink: "Creation Is Not Control"
Trackback: http://publish.creative-weblogging.com/publish/mt-tb.pl/18847
Mr Wong
Vote for "Creation Is Not Control":
|
Rating: 6.00 out of 1 vote(s) cast.
|
Response from:
drivers
(03/25/06 1:38pm)
I have read this all artice and I'm shocked. It's not optimistic.
Response from:
Doom
(06/03/07 11:49pm)
Thank you for giving me place to put my link:
weddinghttp://www.6k2.com/myforum/wedding.html">wedding rel="nofollow" href="weddinghttp://wedding.mundoforo.com/">wedding rel="nofollow" href="wedding')" rel="nofollow">http://wedding.all-forum.net">wedding
[url=http://wedding.mundoforo.com/]wedding[/url][url=http://www.6k2.com/myf
orum/wedding.html]wedding[/url][url=http://wedding.all-forum.net]weddi
ng[/url]
weddinghttp://www.6k2.com/myforum/wedding.html">wedding rel="nofollow" href="weddinghttp://wedding.mundoforo.com/">wedding rel="nofollow" href="wedding')" rel="nofollow">http://wedding.all-forum.net">wedding
[url=http://wedding.mundoforo.com/]wedding[/url][url=http://www.6k2.com/myf
orum/wedding.html]wedding[/url][url=http://wedding.all-forum.net]weddi
ng[/url]
Response from:
Working Capital
(10/18/07 11:24am)
It's simply not acceptable to let phrases like "intellectual property" continue to shape this debate with the false analogies they inspire. IP is not a symbolic parallel to real estate or other assets that can have only one beneficial owner at any time. The central question is not how to prevent ideas and expressions from being stolen; the question is how to maximize the benefit of inspiring people to create new work while minimizing the nuisance of granting them any post-creation rights at all.
Subscribe
Use the search to look for other interesting posts
| RSS | See all blog subscribe options |
|
What is RSS? | |
| Yahoo! |
|
| Addthis |
|
| Bloglines |
|
| Newsletter | |
| Follow us on Twitter! |






