Filed in archive
Legal
, RIAA, IFPI
by Marc on August 28, 2006

But Delina had two strikes against her.
1. RIAA cases are weak to begin with. The hard drive is the only hard proof available. Indeed the judge called RIAA's evidence "scant and piecemeal" without the hard drive. The court ruled RIAA's case was irreparably prejudiced by the hard drive cleaning and ruled for RIAA.
2. The plaintiff was not helped by self-serving and inconsistent statements and untimely and inept behavior. The wipes occurred immediately after receiving legal notices and did not remove evidence of iMesh and BearShare P2P file sharing software.
Read more about Arista v. Tschirhart.
Permalink: RIAA Wins Case of Hard Drive Wipe
Trackback: http://publish.creative-weblogging.com/publish/mt-tb.pl/34387
Mr Wong
Vote for RIAA Wins Case of Hard Drive Wipe:
|
Rating: 6.25 out of 4 vote(s) cast.
|
Subscribe
Use the search to look for other interesting posts
| RSS | See all blog subscribe options |
|
What is RSS? | |
| Yahoo! |
|
| Addthis |
|
| Bloglines |
|
| Newsletter | |
| Follow us on Twitter! |






